Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.24 seconds)Lissy Lyju And Anr. vs Tahsildar And Ors. on 18 August, 2000
After considering the matter, Ext.P15 assessment order was passed,
fixing a total liability to the tune of Rs. 2,46,600/-, treating the building
as a 'single unit', instead of assessing the same separately. In the said
circumstances, the petitioner preferred an appeal, which did not turn to
be fruitful and the appeal was dismissed as per Ext.P16 judgment. This
made the petitioner to approach this Court by filing
O.P.No.13090/2000, which was disposed of as per Ext.P17 judgment,
directing the first respondent to redo the assessment. It was
accordingly, that Ext.P18 order was passed by the assessing officer on
15/05/2001, referring to the law declared by this Court in Lissy v.
WPC.No.16850/07 3
Tahsildar (2000(3)KLT 497).
M/S.Bavasons Constructions Pvt.Ltd vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 23 March, 2007
The writ petition is disposed of, giving one more chance to the
petitioner to establish all the facts and figures by producing the relevant
materials before the assessing authority within 'one month' from this
date, on which event, the same shall be considered and disposed of
following the procedure prescribed by this Court in Bavasons' case
(cited supra). The proceedings as above shall be finalised at the earliest
and, at any rate within 'three months' thereafter.
Section 2 in Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 [Entire Act]
1