Amit Sharma vs Meenakshi on 16 February, 2017
11 There is no concealment of facts by her. All the documents have
been placed on record. The appellant has concealed his true income
and status from the Court. The appellant has placed salary slips for
three months prior to and after March, 2015 but salary slip of March,
2015 is not placed on record by him. The appellant has not filed
income tax returns showing computation of complete income.
12 There is no inconsistency in her claim qua the expenses of
child. The proceedings in the Foreign jurisdiction were exparte. She
has not submitted to the jurisdiction of the Courts at Singapore and
categorically stated that she has no funds to contest the matter. It is
Amit Sharma Vs. Meenakshi - CA No. 204412 of 2016 6/28
settled law that such Foreign decrees are not recognizable in India.
The appellant has abandoned her and minor child. The appellant has
filed deficient documents. The appeal is meritless.
13 The reply to the application is filed by the respondent to the
effect that mere inconvenience on the part of appellant is no ground to
condone the delay. No document is placed on record in support of
averments. There was lack of due diligence on the part of appellant.
There is intentional delay on the part of appellant to file an appeal, so
application be dismissed.