Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.64 seconds)The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
The Societies Registration Act, 1860
The Hindi Sahitya Sammelan Act, 1962
U.P. Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955
Narendra Bahadur Singh And Anr vs State Of U.P. And Ors on 26 November, 1976
4. To substantiate this submission, reliance was placed upon
the decisions in Babu Barkya Thakur's case, State of Madhya
1010
Pradesh & Ors. v. Vishnu Prasad Sharma & Ors.(l) and
Narendra Bahadur Singh's case. All these decisions do not
bear out or substantiate the submission of Mr. Kacker for
the reasons already mentioned.
State Of Madhya Pradesh And Ors vs Vishnu Prasad Sharma And Ors on 9 February, 1966
4. To substantiate this submission, reliance was placed upon
the decisions in Babu Barkya Thakur's case, State of Madhya
1010
Pradesh & Ors. v. Vishnu Prasad Sharma & Ors.(l) and
Narendra Bahadur Singh's case. All these decisions do not
bear out or substantiate the submission of Mr. Kacker for
the reasons already mentioned.
Mahendra Lal Jaini vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh And Others on 7 November, 1962
In
Mahendra Lal Jaini v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.(2)
it was held that a notification under Sec. 4A of the Indian
Forest Act, 1927 is required to be published in the Gazette
and unless it is so published, it is of no effect.
Logically, the same view must be adopted for a notification
under Sec. 4. Therefore assuming that a notification is a
formal expression of a decision of the Government to acquire
land, unless the decision is notified in the Government
Gazette by an appropriate notification, the proceedings for
acquisition cannot be said to have been initiated and the
decision would remain a paper decision. Sec. 4 (1) further
requires that 'the Collector shall cause public notice of
the substance of such notification to be given at convenient
places in the said locality.' The expression 'such
notification.' in the latter part of Sec. 4 (1) and sequence
of events therein enumerated would clearly spell out that
first the Government should reach a decision to acquire
land, then publish a notification under Sec.4 (1) and
simultaneously or within a reasonable time from the date of
the publication of the notification cause a notice to be
published containing substance of such notification meaning
thereby that notification which is published. Obviously,
therefore, there cannot be a publication in the locality
prior to the issuance of the notification.
State Of Punjab vs Gurdial Singh & Ors on 25 October, 1979
In
State of Punjab v. Gurdial Singh & Ors (2) acquisition of
land for constructing a grain market was challenged on the
ground of legal malafides Upholding the challenge this Court
speaking through Krishna Iyer, J. explained the concept of
legal malafides in his hitherto inimitable language, diction
and style and observed as under: