Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.23 seconds)
Ahmednagar Zilla Shetmajur Union vs Mahatma Phule Krushi Vidyapith And ... on 9 December, 2016
cites
The Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Vividh Kamgar Sabha vs Kalyani Steels Ltd. & Anr on 9 January, 2001
9. Suffice it to say, considering the effect of the observations of
the Honourable Supreme Court in paragraph No.5 of the Vividh
Kamgar Sabha Vs. Kalyani Steel [(2001) 2 SCC 381], paragraph Nos.
Cipla Ltd vs Maharashtra General Kamgar Union & Ors on 21 February, 2001
8
and 9 of Cipla Limited Vs. Maharashtra General Kamgar [(2001) 3 SCC
101], and Steel Authority of India Limited and others Vs. National
Union Water Front Workers and others [2001 III CLR 349], the issue
needs to be dealt with, either under the Contract Labour (Regulation
and Abolition) Act, 1970 ("CLRA Act") and/or under the ID Act. The
impugned judgment, therefore, would not come in way of these
contract labourers, considering my view that the complaint could not
have been entertained by the Industrial Court.
Steel Authority Of India Ltd. & Ors. ... vs National Union Water Front Workers & Ors on 30 August, 2001
8
and 9 of Cipla Limited Vs. Maharashtra General Kamgar [(2001) 3 SCC
101], and Steel Authority of India Limited and others Vs. National
Union Water Front Workers and others [2001 III CLR 349], the issue
needs to be dealt with, either under the Contract Labour (Regulation
and Abolition) Act, 1970 ("CLRA Act") and/or under the ID Act. The
impugned judgment, therefore, would not come in way of these
contract labourers, considering my view that the complaint could not
have been entertained by the Industrial Court.
1