Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.03 seconds)
Ravi Seth & Ors. vs N.C.T Of Delhi & Anr. on 21 July, 2023 cites

Amardeep Singh vs Harveen Kaur on 12 September, 2017

9. Both the parties have agreed to file jointly an application for waiver of the statutory period of six months in terms of the Judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Amardeep Singh Vs. Harveen Kaur in civil Appeal No. 11158/2017 alongwith second motion petition for divorce by mutual consent within 30 days of the grant of first motion petition for divorce by mutual consent.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 48 - Cited by 751 - A K Goel - Full Document

B.S. Joshi & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Anr on 13 March, 2003

8. It is settled that the inherent powers under section 482 of the Code are required to be exercised to secure the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of any court. Further, the High Court can quash non- compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties. Supreme Court and this Court have repeatedly held that the cases arising out of matrimonial differences should be put to a quietus if the parties have reached an amicable settlement. Reliance may be placed upon: B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, (2003) 4 SCC 675 ;K. Srinivas CRL.M.C. 4963/2023 Page 6 of 7 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAJ BALA Signing Date:28.07.2023 16:47:17 Rao v. D.A.Deepa, (2013) 5 SCC 226; Yashpal Chaudhrani and Others vs. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) and Another, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 8179.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 11910 - H K Sema - Full Document

K. Srinivas Rao vs D.A. Deepa on 22 February, 2013

8. It is settled that the inherent powers under section 482 of the Code are required to be exercised to secure the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of any court. Further, the High Court can quash non- compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties. Supreme Court and this Court have repeatedly held that the cases arising out of matrimonial differences should be put to a quietus if the parties have reached an amicable settlement. Reliance may be placed upon: B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, (2003) 4 SCC 675 ;K. Srinivas CRL.M.C. 4963/2023 Page 6 of 7 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAJ BALA Signing Date:28.07.2023 16:47:17 Rao v. D.A.Deepa, (2013) 5 SCC 226; Yashpal Chaudhrani and Others vs. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) and Another, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 8179.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 677 - Full Document
1   2 Next