cites: 168085617

1 - 3 of 3 (0.54 seconds)

Samir Kumar Majumdar vs Union Of India . on 20 September, 2023 cites

In Re: Kelly And Henderson P. Ltd., L. Jai ... vs Kelly And Henderson Pvt. Ltd. on 19 March, 1979

33. Almost two centuries ago, in Henderson vs. Henderson, (1843) 3 Hare, 100, the Vice-Chancellor Sir James Wigram felicitously puts the principle thus:-

Bombay High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 40 - S V Manohar - Full Document

Maharashtra Vikrikar Karamchari ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 12 January, 2000

In Maharashtra Vikrikar Karamchari Sangathan vs. State of Maharashtra and Another, (2000) 2 SCC 552, this Court held as under:-

Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 35 - S P Kurdukar - Full Document

M.Nagabhushana vs State Of Karnataka & Ors on 2 February, 2011

35. The doctrine itself is based on public policy flowing from the age-old legal maxim interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium which means that in the interest of the State there should be an end to litigation and no party ought to be vexed twice in a litigation for one and the same cause (See M. Nagabhushana vs. State of Karnataka and Others, (2011) 3 SCC 408.

Supreme Court of India Cites 28 - Cited by 168 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

In Re: Kelly And Henderson P. Ltd., L. Jai ... vs Kelly And Henderson Pvt. Ltd. on 19 March, 1979

Maharashtra Vikrikar Karamchari ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 12 January, 2000

M.Nagabhushana vs State Of Karnataka & Ors on 2 February, 2011