Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.93 seconds)
Lrs Of Rahul vs Sachin on 24 April, 2024 cites

Rajesh Tyagi & Ors. vs Jaibir Singh & Ors. on 8 January, 2021

In view of the directions contained in order dated 18.01.2018 of Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.R. Midha in FAO no. 842/2003 titled as Rajesh Tyagi vs Jaibir Singh, joint statement of petitioners was also recorded on 06.04.2021 wherein she had stated that they were entitled to exemption from deduction of TDS and that they would submit form 15G to insurance co. so that no TDS is LRs of Rahul vs. Sachin and Ors. Page 35 of38 LRs of Rahul vs. Sachin and Ors. Page 36 of38 deducted.
Delhi High Court Cites 64 - Cited by 1363 - J R Midha - Full Document

National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi And Others on 22 June, 2022

In view of the facts and circumstances of the present case and in view of decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of "National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors." mentioned supra, a sum of Rs. 15,000/ each LRs of Rahul vs. Sachin and Ors. Page 25 of38 LRs of Rahul vs. Sachin and Ors. Page 26 of38 towards loss of estate and funeral expenses is awarded in favour of petitioners.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1946 - J R Dua - Full Document

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance ... vs Pooja & Ors. on 2 November, 2017

Further Hon'ble Delhi High Court in appeal titled as "Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pooja & Ors", mentioned supra has been pleased to observe in para 18 of the judgment that the constitution bench decision in Pranay Sethi (supra) does not recognize any other non pecuniary head of damages. Hence, no amount of compensation is being awarded under this head.
Delhi High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 412 - R K Gauba - Full Document

Hindurao Dattoba Yadav(Since Decd. ... vs Sachin Lalaso Patil And Ors on 4 December, 2020

9. After framing of issues, opportunities were given to all the parties to prove their respective averments, by leading evidence in support of the same. In support of their case, the petitioners got examined 3 witnesses. It is noteworthy that there are 2 connected petitions, arising out of the same accident i.e MACT case no. 306/2015, titled as LRs of Rahul vs Sachin and Ors. and MACT case No. 750/18, LRs of Rahul vs. Sachin and Ors. Page 8 of38 LRs of Rahul vs. Sachin and Ors. Page 9 of38 titled as Panna Lal Vs. Sachin and Ors., and for the purpose of evidence, both the files were consolidated and MACT case no. 306/2015, titled as LRs of Rahul Vs Sachin and Ors., was treated as the main Case.
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - S C Gupte - Full Document

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Smt. Somwati And 5 Ors. on 23 May, 2013

35. After the celebrated judgment of "National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. mentioned supra and recent judgment titled New India Assurance Company Limited versus Somwati & Ors., Civil LRs of Rahul vs. Sachin and Ors. Page 24 of38 LRs of Rahul vs. Sachin and Ors. Page 25 of38 Appeal no. 3093 of 2020 dated 07.09.2020, the petitioners are not entitled to be compensated under this head.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 146 - R Kumar - Full Document

M.C.D vs Asscn.,Victims Of Uphaar Tragedy & Ors on 13 October, 2011

In respect of entitlement of the petitioners to interest on the awarded amount, it is noteworthy that the Hon'ble Apex Court had in the case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs. Association of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy, 2012 ACJ 48 (SC) had observed that the victims of Uphaar Tragedy be awarded compensation with interest @ 9% per annum. The present matter is pending trial since 13.07.2015 and the rate of interest of fixed deposits in Nationalized banks has fluctuated/dropped several times during the pendency of the present proceedings.
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 1848 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1   2 Next