Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.19 seconds)Section 33 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 25F in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 10 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
The Payment Of Bonus Act, 1965
Section 33C in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Jagannath Bhagwandas Shrivastav And ... vs Harish Thadani And Anr. on 12 February, 1993
In Jagannath Bhagwandas Shrivastav and Others VS.
Harish Thadani and another 1993 L48. LC. 2508,
Bombay Single Bench of Bombay High Court has held
as follows:
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Management Of Fertilizer Corporation ... vs The Workmen on 15 November, 1968
"It is clear from the scheme of the S. 33 C and
language of sub sec (2) thereof that the only
limited question that a Labour Court can decide
under this sub-section is that amount at which any
benefit should be computed", provided however,
that the workman "is entitled to receive from the
LCA No. 2293/19 Page 10 of 15
employer any, money or benefit". This section
postulates the existence of any relationship of an
employer and workman and entitlement of a
workman to certain benefits. The only dispute that
can be decided by the Labour court under this
section is in a very narrow compass, that is,
relating to the computation of the amount of
money that may be due. Where the very
foundation is absent, the remedy provided to a
workman under the sub- section cannot be availed
of. The power of the court in a proceeding U/S 33
C (2) of the Act, as observed by Supreme Court in
CIWT Corporation Vs. Workmen 1974 LIC 1018:
Basant Lal vs The Management Of A.F. Ferguson & Co. And ... on 30 January, 2002
In Basant Lal vs. Management of M/S A.F. Ferguson
& Co. & Anr. 2002 LLR 612 (Delhi), our Honourable
High Court observed as follows: