Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.59 seconds)
Madanlal vs West Central Railway on 17 June, 2025 cites

Union Of India vs M. Siddaraj on 19 May, 2023

9. For the reasons stated hereinabove, the present case is squarely covered by Hon'ble Supreme Court judgment in case of Director (Admn. & HR) KPTCL (supra) and Union of India Vs. M. Siddaraj (supra), the respondents are directed to consider the case of the applicants and pass appropriate order for grant of benefit of annual notional increment which Page 52 of 53 ANAND 2025.06.18 PRAKASH 09:54:47 DUBEY +05'30' 53 was to be added w.e.f. 1st July or 1st January of the next year, as the applicants stood retired on 30th June or 31st December, as the case may be, and in case the applicants are found eligible for grant of such annual increment. The respondents are directed to do needful and grant one annual notional increment to the applicants within a period of 90 days from date of receipt of certified copy of order.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

The Director (Admn. And Hr) Kptcl vs C.P. Mundinamani on 11 April, 2023

9. For the reasons stated hereinabove, the present case is squarely covered by Hon'ble Supreme Court judgment in case of Director (Admn. & HR) KPTCL (supra) and Union of India Vs. M. Siddaraj (supra), the respondents are directed to consider the case of the applicants and pass appropriate order for grant of benefit of annual notional increment which Page 52 of 53 ANAND 2025.06.18 PRAKASH 09:54:47 DUBEY +05'30' 53 was to be added w.e.f. 1st July or 1st January of the next year, as the applicants stood retired on 30th June or 31st December, as the case may be, and in case the applicants are found eligible for grant of such annual increment. The respondents are directed to do needful and grant one annual notional increment to the applicants within a period of 90 days from date of receipt of certified copy of order.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 557 - M R Shah - Full Document
1