Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.18 seconds)
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd vs Meenakshi & Ors on 30 May, 2012 cites

Arun Kumar Agrawal & Anr vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors on 22 July, 2010

3. It is urged by the learned counsel for the Insurance Company that the Claims Tribunal erred in taking the income of the deceased as `4057/- per month. The Claims Tribunal ought to have decided the case on the basis of the law laid down in Arun Kumar Agrawal & Anr. v. National Insurance Company Limited., (2010) 9 SCC 218 and Lata Wadhwa & Ors. v. State of Bihar & Ors., (2001) 8 SCC 197.
Supreme Court of India Cites 29 - Cited by 292 - G S Singhvi - Full Document

Sunil Sharma& Ors vs Bachitar Singh & Ors on 7 February, 2011

8. The Claims Tribunal awarded a sum of `50,000/- towards loss of love and affection. Loss of love and affection can never be measured in terms of money. Thus, uniformity has to be adopted by the Courts while granting non-pecuniary damages. The Supreme Court in Sunil Sharma v. Bachitar Singh (2011) 11 SCC 425 and in Baby Radhika Gupta v. Oriental Insurance Company Limited (2009) 17 SCC 627 granted only ` 25,000/- (in total to all the claimants) under the head of loss of love and MAC. APP. 1061/2011 Page 5 of 7 affection. Thus, I would reduce the compensation under this head from `50,000/- to ` 25,000/- only.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 359 - Full Document

Baby Radhika Gupta & Ors vs Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors on 24 November, 2009

8. The Claims Tribunal awarded a sum of `50,000/- towards loss of love and affection. Loss of love and affection can never be measured in terms of money. Thus, uniformity has to be adopted by the Courts while granting non-pecuniary damages. The Supreme Court in Sunil Sharma v. Bachitar Singh (2011) 11 SCC 425 and in Baby Radhika Gupta v. Oriental Insurance Company Limited (2009) 17 SCC 627 granted only ` 25,000/- (in total to all the claimants) under the head of loss of love and MAC. APP. 1061/2011 Page 5 of 7 affection. Thus, I would reduce the compensation under this head from `50,000/- to ` 25,000/- only.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 332 - Full Document
1