Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 26 (0.35 seconds)The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882
The Explosive Substances Act, 1908
Section 17 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Gujarat Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947
Helper Girdhiarbhai vs Saiyed Mohmad Mirasaheb Kadri And ... on 6 May, 1987
"5. The ambit and scope of the said
section came up for consideration before
this Court in Helper Girdharbhai v.
Saiyed Mohmad Mirasaheb Kadri and after
referring to a catena of authorities,
Sabyasachi Mukherji, J. drew a
distinction between the appellate and
the revisional jurisdiction of the
courts and opined that the distinction
was a real one. It was held that the
right to appeal carries with it the
right of rehearing both on question of
law and fact, unless the statute
conferring the right to appeal itself
limits the rehearing in some way, while
the power to hear a revision is
generally given to a superior court so
that it may satisfy itself that a
particular case is decided according to
law. The Bench opined that although the
High Court had wider powers than that
which could be exercised under Section
115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, yet
its revisional jurisdiction could only
be exercised for a limited purpose with
a view to satisfying itself that the
decision under challenge before it is
according to law. The High Court cannot
substitute its own findings on a
question of fact for the findings
recorded by the courts below on
reappraisal of evidence. Did the High
Court exceed its jurisdiction?
Section 15 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Limitation Act, 1963
Gundalapalli Rangamannar Chetty vs Desu Rangiah And Ors. on 15 February, 1952
We may
mention that in Gundalapalli Rangamannar
Chetty v. Desu Rangiah, AIR 1954 Mad.
182, Subba Rao, J. as the learned Chief
Justice then was, held that there cannot
be a subletting, unless the lessee
parted with legal possession. The mere
fact that another is allowed to use the
premises while the lessee retains the
legal possession is not enough to create
a sub-lease."
Smt. Rajbir Kaur & Anr vs S. Chokesiri & Co on 9 August, 1988
In Rajbir Kaur v. S. Chokesiri and
Co., this Court considered this aspect
of the matter and in para 43, as dealt
with the aforesaid question elaborately: