Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.28 seconds)Section 4 in THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972 [Entire Act]
Section 15 in THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972 [Entire Act]
Section 2A in THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972 [Entire Act]
Collector Land Acquisition, Anantnag & ... vs Mst. Katiji & Ors on 19 February, 1987
18. In this case the first authority by his order dated February 24, 1997 was pleased to dismiss the application only on the ground of limitation. However, thereafter, appeal was filed and the appellate authority by his order dated March 26, 1998 was pleased to condone the delay and passed order on merits of the matter. Mr. Mishra, learned advocate, for the petitioner has tried to seriously assail the order of the appellate authority and stated that the appellate authority has incorrectly decided the matter and has not given any reason for condonation of delay. It is, no doubt, true that the appellate authority has not given reasons for condonation of delay. However, Mr. Oza, learned advocate for the respondent workman, stated that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag v. Katiji, reported in AIR 1987 SC 1353 : 1987 (2) SCC 107 : 1987-I-LLJ-500 has summarized the principle for condonation of delay. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed as under at p. 501 of LLJ: