Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.89 seconds)Section 4 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Raj Talreja vs Kavita Talreja on 24 April, 2017
In another judgment the Apex Court in RAJ TALREJA v. KAVITA TALREJA7,
the Apex Court held that filing of false cases and making reckless allegations against her
husband, his family members and colleagues, amounts to 'cruelty'. The Apex Court
considering the facts and circumstances of that case, granted divorce. However, the
Apex Court also granted permanent alimony to the wife therein considering the status
of the parties.
K. Srinivas Rao vs D.A. Deepa on 22 February, 2013
22. The Apex Court in the decision reported in K.SRINIVAS RAO vs. D.A.DEEPA (4
supra), held as under:
Shri. Nitin Ramesh Dhiwar vs Smt. Roopali Nitin Dhiwar on 28 February, 2019
In the decision relied on by the learned counsel for the petitioner / appellant
in Nitin Ramesh Dhiwar vs. Roopali Nitin Dhiwar (1 supra), the High Court of Bombay
held as under:
Smt. P. Padma vs Sri P. Chennaiah on 13 July, 2021
18. A Division Bench of this court in the decision reported in P.PADMA v.
P.CHENNAIAH6 held that making false, scandalous, malicious and baseless charges
against the husband by wife, prima facie amounts to cruelty and on the basis of same,
husband is entitled to decree of divorce. The relevant portion is thus:
Samar Ghosh vs Jaya Ghosh on 26 March, 2007
In support of this submission, learned
counsel relied on the judgments of the Apex Court reported in K.SRINIVAS RAO vs.
D.A.DEEPA4 and SAMAR GHOSH vs. JAYA GHOSH5
Devesh Yadav vs Meenal on 8 April, 2022
In
support of his contention, learned counsel relied on the judgments reported in NITIN
5
RAMESH DHIWAR vs. ROOPALI NITIN DHIWAR1, RAJ TALREJA v. KAVITA TALREJA2,
DEVESH YADAV v. MEENAL3.