Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (1.47 seconds)Maharashtra State Financial ... vs Jaycee Drugs And Pharmaceuticals Pvt. ... on 19 February, 1991
11. Similarly, the decision relied upon by
'GUJARAT STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION VS.
NATSON MANUFACTURING CO. PVT. LTD AND
ORS.', AIR 1978 SC 1765, 'PRAKASH PLAYING
CARDS MANUFACTURING CO., DELHI AND ORS. VS.
DELHI FINANCIAL CORPORATION , NEW DELHI',
AIR 1980 DEL 48, supra have no application to the fact
situation of the case, as in the aforesaid decisions,
amended provisions of section 31(1) of the Act have not
been noticed.
M/S. O.K. Gaur & Company & Another vs Rajasthan Finance Corporation on 11 July, 2000
Similarly, the decision rendered by High
court of Bombay as well as High court of Rajasthan and
High court of Punjab and Haryana in 'THE
MAHARASHTRA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
VS. JAYCEE DRUGS & PHARMACEUTICALS PVT.
LTD. AND ORS.', AIR 1991 BOM 96, 'O.K. GAUR &
18
COMPANY AND ORS. VS. RAJSTHAN FINANCE
CORPORATION', AIR 2001 RAJ 4, 'KIRIL FINE ART
AND ORS. VS. THE MAHARASHTRA STATE
FINANCIAL CORPORATION', AIR 1998 BOM 207,
'MELA RAM VS. SHIROMANI GURUDWARA
PARBANDHAK COMMITTEE, ARITSAR', AIR 1992 P
& H 252, supra are per incuriam as in the aforesaid
decision, the decision of the Supreme Court in
Maharashtra State Financial Corporation supra has not
been noticed. Therefore, the contention of the appellants
that in proceedings under Section 31(1) of the Act, the
Trial Court could not have passed a money decree does
not deserve acceptance.
A.P. State Financial Corpn vs Gar Re-Rolling Mills on 10 February, 1994
In view of
aforesaid enunciation of law by the Supreme Court, the
decision relied upon by the learned counsel for the
appellants in the case of 'ANDHRA PRADESH STATE
FINANCIAL CORPORATION VS. GAR RE-ROLLING
MILLS AND ORS,', AIR 1994 SC 2151, is of no
17
assistance to he appellants as appellants in the fact
situation of the case as in the aforesaid decision the
Supreme Court was dealing with the issue of doctrine of
election of remedies.
Gujarat State Financial Corporation vs M/S. Natson Manufacturing Co. (P) Ltd. & ... on 29 August, 1978
11. Similarly, the decision relied upon by
'GUJARAT STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION VS.
NATSON MANUFACTURING CO. PVT. LTD AND
ORS.', AIR 1978 SC 1765, 'PRAKASH PLAYING
CARDS MANUFACTURING CO., DELHI AND ORS. VS.
DELHI FINANCIAL CORPORATION , NEW DELHI',
AIR 1980 DEL 48, supra have no application to the fact
situation of the case, as in the aforesaid decisions,
amended provisions of section 31(1) of the Act have not
been noticed.
Section 29 in The State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
Section 31 in The State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
The State Financial Corporations Act, 1951
Kiril Fine Art And Ors. vs The Maharashtra State Financial ... on 17 March, 1997
Similarly, the decision rendered by High
court of Bombay as well as High court of Rajasthan and
High court of Punjab and Haryana in 'THE
MAHARASHTRA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
VS. JAYCEE DRUGS & PHARMACEUTICALS PVT.
LTD. AND ORS.', AIR 1991 BOM 96, 'O.K. GAUR &
18
COMPANY AND ORS. VS. RAJSTHAN FINANCE
CORPORATION', AIR 2001 RAJ 4, 'KIRIL FINE ART
AND ORS. VS. THE MAHARASHTRA STATE
FINANCIAL CORPORATION', AIR 1998 BOM 207,
'MELA RAM VS. SHIROMANI GURUDWARA
PARBANDHAK COMMITTEE, ARITSAR', AIR 1992 P
& H 252, supra are per incuriam as in the aforesaid
decision, the decision of the Supreme Court in
Maharashtra State Financial Corporation supra has not
been noticed. Therefore, the contention of the appellants
that in proceedings under Section 31(1) of the Act, the
Trial Court could not have passed a money decree does
not deserve acceptance.