Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.17 seconds)
Mr. Vasant Shankar Toraskar & Ors. vs M/S. Shreeji Builders on 23 April, 2012 cites

Lucknow Development Authority vs M.K. Gupta on 5 November, 1993

10. The impugned order cites the decision of the Supreme Court of India in Lucknow Development Authority Vs. M.K.Gupta (1994) 1 SCC 243 and has noted that the entire purpose of widening the definition of service under Section 2 (1) (d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was to include not only day to day buying of goods by a common man, but even to include such activities, which are otherwise not commercial but professional or service orientated in nature.
Supreme Court of India Cites 30 - Cited by 1040 - R M Sahai - Full Document

Faqir Chand Gulati vs Uppal Agencies Pvt. Ltd. & Anr on 10 July, 2008

11. This decision in the above mentioned case has been examined at length and relied upon by the Apex Court in Fakhir Chand Gulati Vs. Uppal Agencies Pvt. Ltd. (2008) 10 SCC 345. In this decision, Honble Supreme Court has considered the subject of building construction agreement between landowner and the builder at great length, with reference to the issue whether such an agreement is a joint venture where there is no hiring/availment of services of a builder or whether it could be one between the consumer i.e. land owner and a service provider i.e. the builder.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 370 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1