Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.36 seconds)Section 26 in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Special Marriage Act, 1954
Section 11 in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
Section 12 in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005
Parvin Kumar Jain vs Anju Jain on 8 February, 2021
3. On the contrary, Mr. Achyutananda
Routray, learned counsel appearing for the OP-wife by
taking this Court through the relevant portion of the
counter affidavit has submitted that the petitioner-
husband is not only a qualified person, but also an
Electrical Engineer by profession with 32 years of
experience in a reputed organization and he thereby
may be directed to pay the pendentelite maintenance of
Rs.50,000/- per month because the wife and daughter
of the petitioner are also entitled to live commensurate
to the standard of living of the petitioner. Further, Mr.
WP(C) No.4283 of 2024 Page 3 of 14
Routray by referring to the decision in Parvin Kumar
Jain vs. Anju Jain; (2024) SCC Online SC 3678 has
submitted that not only the wife, but also the minor
children are entitled to the pendentelite maintenance
U/S.24 of the Act and even though the children have
not been explicitly referred to therein in Section 24 of
the Act, but the minor children being dependents to
their parents for maintenance and Section 26 of the Act
provides for the maintenance of children, it would not
be advisable to read application U/S. 24 of the Act in
isolation to these factors while granting pendentlite
maintenance to the spouse and children. Mr. Routray
accordingly has prayed to dismiss the writ petition.
1