Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.19 seconds)

Ramesh Chand Rai vs State Of U.P. on 6 July, 2018

8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in particular, that in nine cases either FIRs have been quashed by the Supreme Court or charge-sheets have been quashed by this Court; in seven cases the applicant is not named, only investigation is going on and no charge-sheet has been submitted; and in one case relating to Gangsters Act, final report has been submitted which was accepted and except this case only one another case under the Gangsters Act is pending and the aforesaid judgment in Ramesh Rai (supra) relied on by the learned counsel for the applicant and the submissions made but without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court is of opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 38 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Rasid Javed & Ors vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 5 July, 2010

5. Learned counsel for the applicant further contends that all the FIRs have been lodged from the year 2017 in District Saharanpur due to political rivalry for the reason that the applicant's father was Ex-MLC. The applicant was neither the member nor the leader of any gang. All the accused persons except three having similar role have been enlarged on bail by co-ordinate Benches of this Court vide orders dated; (i) 02.01.2023 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.47236 of 2022 (Javed Vs. State of UP); (ii) 10.11.2022 in Criminal Misc.
Supreme Court of India Cites 29 - Cited by 77 - Full Document
1