Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.41 seconds)
P.Saravanan vs / cites

Psa Sical Terminals Pvt. Ltd. vs The Board Of Trustees Of V.O. ... on 28 July, 2021

In PSA Sical Terminals Private Ltd. v. V.O.Chidambaram Port Trust reported in (2023) 15 SCC 781, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held, “The scope of interference would be limited to grounds provided under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. The interference would be so warranted when the award is in violation of “public policy of India”, which has been held to mean “the fundamental policy of Indian law”. A judicial intervention on account of interfering on the merits of the award would not be permissible. However, the principles of natural justice as contained in Sections 18 and 34(2)(a)(iii) of the Arbitration Act would continue to be the grounds of challenge of an award. The ground for interference on the basis that the award is in conflict with justice or morality is now to be understood as a conflict with the “most basic notions of morality or justice”. It is only such arbitral awards that shock the ______________ Page Nos.16/29 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/10/2025 08:17:26 pm ) C.M.A.Nos.2139 of 2021 & 2349 of 2024 conscience of the court, that can be set aside on the said ground. An award would be set aside on the ground of patent illegality appearing on the face of the award and as such, which goes to the roots of the matter.”
Supreme Court of India Cites 50 - Cited by 141 - B R Gavai - Full Document
1   2 Next