State Of Orissa vs Dhaniram Luhar on 4 February, 2004
In State of Orissa Vs. Dhaniram Luhar2 this Court, while reiterating that reason is the heart beat of every conclusion and without the same, it becomes lifeless, observed thus :
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 27 (0.30 seconds)Rakesh Kumar Goel Etc vs U.P.State Industrial Dev.Corpn.Ltd.& ... on 8 July, 2010
4. It is further stated that being aggrieved by the order dated 08.11.2024, the petitioner preferred an appeal registered as Appeal/Case No.1978/2024, Computerized Case No. C202408000001978 (Rakesh Vs. State of U.P.) and the same has been dismissed vide order dated 15.04.2025 passed by the opposite party No. 2/Divisional Commissioner, Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda without dealing with the factual aspects of the case and the grounds taken in the appeal as well as law on the subject.
Uttar Pradesh Control Of Goondas Act, 1970
Lalani Pandey @ Vijay Shanker Pandey S/O ... vs State Of U.P. Thru Secretary Home & Ors. on 16 December, 2010
5. Reliance has been placed on the judgments passed by this Court in the case of Shankar Ji Shukla vs. Ayukt, Allahabad Mandal, Allahabad and others, 2004 SCC OnLine All 133; Lalani Pandey @ Vijay Shanker Pandey vs. State of U.P. and Others decided on 16.12.2010 [Writ Petition No. 5905 (MS) of 2010]; Wahid @ Abdul Wahid vs. State of U.P. and 3 Others decided on 02.09.2024 (Criminal Misc.
Abdul Wahid vs State Of U.P. on 22 February, 2017
5. Reliance has been placed on the judgments passed by this Court in the case of Shankar Ji Shukla vs. Ayukt, Allahabad Mandal, Allahabad and others, 2004 SCC OnLine All 133; Lalani Pandey @ Vijay Shanker Pandey vs. State of U.P. and Others decided on 16.12.2010 [Writ Petition No. 5905 (MS) of 2010]; Wahid @ Abdul Wahid vs. State of U.P. and 3 Others decided on 02.09.2024 (Criminal Misc.
Vijay Narain Singh vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 12 April, 1984
21. The Apex Court also in Competition Commission of India Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. & Anr. JT 2010 (10) SC 26 in para 68 referring to the judgment in the case of Gurdial Singh Fijji (supra) said:
Union Of India vs Mohan Lal Capoor & Others on 26 September, 1973
20. The Apex Court in Kranti Associates Private Limited & Anr. Vs. Masood Ahmed Khan & Ors. (2010) 9 SCC 496 referring to the judgment in Mohan Lal Capoor (supra) in para(s) 23 and 47 said:
Uma Charan vs State Of Madhya Pradesh And Anr on 20 August, 1981
14. The Apex Court in the case of Uma Charan Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr. AIR 1981 SC 1915 said:
S.N. Mukherjee vs Union Of India on 28 August, 1990
15. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of S.N. Mukherjee v. Union of India, AIR 1990 SC 1984, has explained that reasons are necessary links between the facts and the findings recorded in the administrative orders, which visit a party with evil civil consequences. In absence of reasons such an order cannot be permitted to stand.
Raj Kishore Jha vs State Of Bihar And Ors on 7 October, 2003
16. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Raj Kishore Jha v. State of Bihar and others, (2003) 11 SCC 519, has held that reasons are the heartbeat of every conclusion and without the same, it becomes lifeless.