Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.50 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 201 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 203 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
M.R. Gupta vs Union Of India & Ors on 21 August, 1995
In M.R.Gupta v. Union of India and others (supra), it has been held by
the Hon'ble Supreme Court that where a service related claim is based on a
continuing wrong, relief can be granted even if there is a long delay in
seeking remedy with reference to the date on which the continuing wrong
commenced, if such continuing wrong creates a continuing source of injury.
Section 19 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Union Of India & Anr vs Tarsem Singh on 13 August, 2008
In Union of India and others v. Tarsem Singh (supra), it has been observed
by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that the principles underlying continuing
Page 8 of 10
9 O A 3565/17
wrongs and recurring/successive wrongs have been applied to service law
disputes. A "continuing wrong" refers to a single wrongful act which causes
a continuing injury. "Recurring/successive wrongs" are those which occur
periodically; each wrong giving rise to a distinct and separate cause of
action. A belated service related claim will be rejected on the ground of
delay and laches (where remedy is sought by filing a writ petition) or
limitation (where remedy is sought by an application to the Administrative
Tribunal). One of the exceptions to be said rule is cases relating to a
continuing wrong. Where a service related claim is based on a continuing
wrong, relief can be granted even if there is a long delay in seeking remedy,
with reference to the date on which the continuing wrong commenced, if
such continuing wrong creates a continuing source of injury. Having
considered the facts and circumstances of the case in the light of the above
decisions, this Tribunal overrules the plea of limitation raised by the
respondents.