Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 26 (0.38 seconds)Section 3 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 4 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 106 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Madhu Limaye vs The State Of Maharashtra on 31 October, 1977
When the question that has arisen in the present case is examined in the light of the above observations made in Amar Nath's case and Madhu Limaye's case, it is clear that the order of the High Court is not sustainable and as such is liable to be set aside as the order of discharge passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate does not fall within the definition of the term "interlocutory order" and the inherent power of the High Court is not limited."
Maya Devi & Anr vs State Of Haryana on 7 December, 2015
The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Maya Devi and another vs. State of Haryana reported in (2015) 17 Supreme Court Cases 405 has held that in case of dowry death if the ingredients of dowry death are satisfied, the burden shall be on the accused to disprove the presumption of causing dowry death as defined under section 113B of the Indian Evidence Act.