Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.23 seconds)Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Ashutosh Dubey And Anr. vs Tilak Grih Nirman Sahakari Samiti ... on 11 November, 2003
Counsel for petitioner has placed reliance upon the
single bench judgment of this court in the matter of
Ashutosh Dubey and another Vs. Tilak Grih Nirman
Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Bhopal and another 2004(2)
MPHT 14, but in that case the Commission was issued by
the trial court for investigating the fact that who was in
possession of the disputed property, but that is not so in
the present case.
Samiti Prabandhak Seva Sahkari Samiti ... vs Jugan Bai & Ors. on 31 August, 2015
He has also placed reliance upon the
single bench judgment of this court in the matter of Seva
Ram Vs. Sugan Bai and others 2009 RN 192 but in that
case in the second appeal the issue of jurisdiction on the
basis of Sec.257(g) of the MPLR Code was raised and that
was not a case relating to issuance of Commission.
Jaswant Kaur vs Din Dayal on 16 November, 2012
In the matter of Jaswant Vs. Deen Dayal
2011(3) MPHT 422 this court has held that in case of
border dispute about land between the parties it is the duty
of the court to issue a commission to get the land
demarcated.
Jai Singh & Ors vs M.C.D. & Anr on 23 September, 2010
Even otherwise, the Supreme Court in the matter of
Jai Singh and others Vs. Municipal Corporation of
Delhi and Another reported in 2010(9) SCC 385 while
considering the scope of interference under Article 227 of
the Constitution, has held that the jurisdiction under Article
227 cannot be exercised to correct all errors of judgment of
a court, or tribunal acting within the limits of its jurisdiction.
Correctional jurisdiction can be exercised in cases where
orders have been passed in grave dereliction of duty or in
flagrant abuse of fundamental principles of law or justice.
1