Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.30 seconds)
Smt. Musarrat Jahan Alias Rani vs Additional District Judge And 2 Others on 2 December, 2020 cites

Smt. Hajra Begum vs Mansoor Ali And Others on 23 November, 2012

12. Thus, such a joint tenant may remain obliged to satisfy the concerned court/authority as to the prejudice being caused to him on account of non impleadment in the proceedings. Though, no hard and fast rule can be laid down in this regard, however as noticed in Hajra Begum Vs. Mansoor Ali & Others (supra) that right may be tested on equitable considerations, in the interest of justice.
Allahabad High Court Cites 44 - Cited by 3 - S Agarwal - Full Document

Shri Harish Tandon vs The Addl.District Magistrate, ... on 5 January, 1995

8. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, insofar as the principle to be applied is concerned, there is no doubt that notwithstanding the provision of Section 3(a)(ii) of UP Act No.13 of 1972, it is not the position in law that in case of a non-residential tenancy, all heirs of the deceased tenant must necessarily be impleaded as defendant-respondents before such proceeding may arise or be concluded. The position in that regard had been clarified by the Supreme Court long ago in case of Harish Tandon Vs. Addl.
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 144 - N P Singh - Full Document

A. L. Paul vs Shailbala Martin 40 Cont/249/2018 Veer ... on 27 March, 2019

In that regard reliance has been placed on three decision of this Court in Smt. Maya Devi Vs. Prescribed Authority, Moradabad & Others 1991 (1) ARC 284; Rafiqa Begum (Smt.) Vs. Abdul Salam & 4 Others 2015 (3) ARC 637 and another decision in the case in Matters under Article 227 No.3696 of 2018 (Smt. Kishan Kumari Vs. Prescribed Authority, Hathras & 2 Others) decided on 29.05.2018.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 78 - Full Document
1