Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.29 seconds)
Ireen Sultana & Ors vs Anjumara Bewa & Anr on 29 November, 2011 cites

Shamim Ara vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 1 October, 2002

14. Per contra, Ms. Mondal contended that the trial Court committed error in recording a prima facie satisfaction that marital tie between Ataur and the opposite party no.1 had snapped and that the petitioners had been successful in, prima facie, establishing their entitlement to the debts and securities of Ataur. According to her, there was no 'talaqnama' and that Ataur had never pronounced 'talaq'. She relied on the decisions reported in (2002) 7 SCC 518 : Shamin Ara v. State of U.P. and anr., 2004 (3) CHN 417 : Mohinuddin Middya v. State of West Bengal and ors., and AIR 2004 Karnataka 261 : Mohd. Ibrahim v. Mehrunisa Begum on the principles of law in respect of pronouncement and communication of 'talaq' and it was submitted that pronouncement of 'talaq', if at all by Ataur, does not amount to a valid 'talaq' in the light of such accepted principles and, therefore, the contention of the petitioners that marriage between Ataur and the opposite party no.1 had been dissolved is without merit. She, accordingly, prayed for dismissal of the revisional application.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 139 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Mohinuddin Middya vs State Of West Bengal And Anr. on 30 January, 2004

14. Per contra, Ms. Mondal contended that the trial Court committed error in recording a prima facie satisfaction that marital tie between Ataur and the opposite party no.1 had snapped and that the petitioners had been successful in, prima facie, establishing their entitlement to the debts and securities of Ataur. According to her, there was no 'talaqnama' and that Ataur had never pronounced 'talaq'. She relied on the decisions reported in (2002) 7 SCC 518 : Shamin Ara v. State of U.P. and anr., 2004 (3) CHN 417 : Mohinuddin Middya v. State of West Bengal and ors., and AIR 2004 Karnataka 261 : Mohd. Ibrahim v. Mehrunisa Begum on the principles of law in respect of pronouncement and communication of 'talaq' and it was submitted that pronouncement of 'talaq', if at all by Ataur, does not amount to a valid 'talaq' in the light of such accepted principles and, therefore, the contention of the petitioners that marriage between Ataur and the opposite party no.1 had been dissolved is without merit. She, accordingly, prayed for dismissal of the revisional application.
Calcutta High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Mohd. Ibrahim vs Mehrunisa Begum on 27 November, 2003

14. Per contra, Ms. Mondal contended that the trial Court committed error in recording a prima facie satisfaction that marital tie between Ataur and the opposite party no.1 had snapped and that the petitioners had been successful in, prima facie, establishing their entitlement to the debts and securities of Ataur. According to her, there was no 'talaqnama' and that Ataur had never pronounced 'talaq'. She relied on the decisions reported in (2002) 7 SCC 518 : Shamin Ara v. State of U.P. and anr., 2004 (3) CHN 417 : Mohinuddin Middya v. State of West Bengal and ors., and AIR 2004 Karnataka 261 : Mohd. Ibrahim v. Mehrunisa Begum on the principles of law in respect of pronouncement and communication of 'talaq' and it was submitted that pronouncement of 'talaq', if at all by Ataur, does not amount to a valid 'talaq' in the light of such accepted principles and, therefore, the contention of the petitioners that marriage between Ataur and the opposite party no.1 had been dissolved is without merit. She, accordingly, prayed for dismissal of the revisional application.
Karnataka High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 2 - R M Reddy - Full Document
1