Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.50 seconds)Rishi Pal Singh & Ors vs Meerut Development Authority & Anr on 24 February, 2006
In Rishi Pal Singh and Others vs. Meerut
Development Authority and Anr. reported in (2006)
3 SCC 205, this Court while dealing with the issue
relating to a large tract of land held as follows:-
Administrator General Of West Bengal vs Collector, Varanasi on 16 February, 1988
In Administrator General of West Bengal v. Collector,
Varanasi, reported at (1988) 2 SCC 150, this Court held
(paragraph 12) that where large tracts of land are required
to be valued, valuation in transactions with regard to small
plots cannot directly be adopted for valuing the
compensation of large tracts of land.
Brig. Sahib Singh Kalha And Ors. vs Amritsar Improvement Trust And Ors. on 1 October, 1981
In Sahib Singh Kalha v.
Amritsar Improvement Trust this Court indicated
that deductions for land required for roads and
other developmental expenses can, together, come
up to as much as 53 per cent. But the prices
fetched for small plots cannot directly be applied in
the case of large areas, for the reason that the
former reflects the "retail" price of land and the
latter the "wholesale" price."
Ranvir Singh & Anr vs Union Of India on 7 September, 2005
1. On the admissibility and relevance of sale deeds, this
Court in Ranvir Singh & Anr. V. Union of India
reported in (2005) 12 SCC 59 held as follows: -
Kasturi & Ors vs State Of Haryana on 12 November, 2002
In the case of Kasturi & Ors. v. State of Haryana
reported in (2003) 1 SCC 354 this Court held as follows:
Lal Chand vs Union Of India & Anr on 12 August, 2009
In Lal Chand v. Union of India & Anr., reported at
(2009) 15 SCC 769, this Court while determining the
rate at which development charges may be deducted,
held (paragraph 8):
Shyam Sunder Agarwal & Co vs Union Of India on 9 January, 1996
4. Therefore, relying on the Exhibits which were produced
by the claimants-respondents and which are found as
a reliable yardstick for determining the valuation in
the present case, we determine the market value of the
land at Rs. 50/- per square yard as on the date of the
notification and direct that 1/3rd of the awarded
18
amount shall be deducted from the aforesaid valuation
towards development charges. It is needless to point
out here that the respondents shall also be entitled to
the statutory benefits as provided for under Section
23(1), 28 and 34 of the Act for which the decision
rendered in the case of Sunder v. Union of India
reported in (2001) 7 SCC 211 which was later
affirmed and elaborated in the case of Gurpreet Singh
vs. Union of India reported in (2006) 8 SCC 457
would be applicable.
Gurpreet Singh vs Union Of India on 19 October, 2006
4. Therefore, relying on the Exhibits which were produced
by the claimants-respondents and which are found as
a reliable yardstick for determining the valuation in
the present case, we determine the market value of the
land at Rs. 50/- per square yard as on the date of the
notification and direct that 1/3rd of the awarded
18
amount shall be deducted from the aforesaid valuation
towards development charges. It is needless to point
out here that the respondents shall also be entitled to
the statutory benefits as provided for under Section
23(1), 28 and 34 of the Act for which the decision
rendered in the case of Sunder v. Union of India
reported in (2001) 7 SCC 211 which was later
affirmed and elaborated in the case of Gurpreet Singh
vs. Union of India reported in (2006) 8 SCC 457
would be applicable.