cites: 169546298

1 - 6 of 6 (0.29 seconds)

Ashok Kumar vs Punjab State Civil Supplies ... on 11 January, 2018 cites

Jagdish Lal & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 7 May, 1997

In case Jagdish Lal v. State of Haryana, 1998(1) SCT 26 (SC) : (1997) 6 SCC 538, the Hon'ble Apex Court observed that if a person chose to sit over the matter and woke up after the decision of Court, then such person cannot stand to benefit. In that case, it was observed as follows:-

Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 614 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs C.K.Dharagupta & Ors on 31 December, 1996

"We, however, clarify that in view of our finding that the judgment of the Tribunal in R.P. Joshi gives relief only to Joshi, the benefit of the said judgment of the Tribunal cannot be extended to any other person.

Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 73 - S S Ahmad - Full Document

Brijesh Kumar & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 24 March, 2014

In Brijesh Kumar and others vs. State of Haryana and others, 2014 (11) SCC 351, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has laid down various principles in which law of limitation has legal maxim.

Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 259 - Full Document

Esha Bhattacharjee vs Mg.Commit.Of Raghunathpur Nafar ... on 13 September, 2013

While relying upon the judgment in case of Esha Bhattacharjee vs. Raghunathpur Nafar Academy 3 of 5 ::: Downloaded on - 04-02-2018 11:25:52 ::: CWP No. 28896 of 2017 -4 - & others, 2013(4) RCR (Civil) 785, the Hon'ble Apex Court principles regarding delay and laches were laid down which can be summarized as under:-

Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 1544 - D Misra - Full Document

Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Constitution Article Cites 5 - Cited by 1058585

Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Constitution Article Cites 19 - Cited by 19525

Search Results Page

Refine Search