Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 28 (0.26 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Anvar P.V vs P.K.Basheer & Ors on 18 September, 2014
14. Therefore, all the criminal appeals stand allowed and
the judgment of conviction dated 27.05.2015 and the order of
sentence dated 04.06.2015, passed by Shri Ashok Kumar,
Additional Sessions Judge 2nd, Bhabua in connection with Sessions
Trial No.97 of 2014, Trial No.127 of 2014 arising out of Adhaura
P.S. case No.44 of 2013, are set aside.
Shafhi Mohammad vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh on 3 April, 2018
73.2. The clarification referred to above is
that the required certificate under Section
65-B(4) is unnecessary if the original
document itself is produced. This can be
done by the owner of a laptop computer,
computer tablet or even a mobile phone,
by stepping into the witness box and
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.609 of 2015 dt.13-10-2023
14/23
proving that the device concerned, on
which the original information is first
stored, is owned and/or operated by him.
Section 364 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 27 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
Arjun Panditrao Khotkar vs Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal on 14 July, 2020
"21. Lastly, this appeal also raised an important
substantive question of law that whether the call
records produced by the prosecution would be
admissible under Sections 65-A and 65-B of the
Evidence Act, given the fact that the requirement
of certification of electronic evidence has not
been complied with as contemplated under the
Act. The uncertainty of whether Anvar P.V. v. P.K.
Basheer [Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer, (2014) 10
SCC 473] occupies the field in this area of law or
whether Shafhi Mohammad v. State of H.P.
[Shafhi Mohammad v. State of H.P., (2018) 2
SCC 801] lays down the correct law in this
regard has now been conclusively settled by this
Court by a judgment dated 14-7-2020 in Arjun
Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao
Gorantyal [Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash
Kushanrao Gorantyal, (2020) 7 SCC 1 : (2020) 4
SCC (Civ) 1 : (2020) 3 SCC (Cri) 1 : (2020) 2
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.609 of 2015 dt.13-10-2023
12/23
SCC (L&S) 587] wherein the Court has held
that : (Arjun Panditrao Khotkar [Arjun
Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao
Gorantyal, (2020) 7 SCC 1 : (2020) 4 SCC (Civ)
1 : (2020) 3 SCC (Cri) 1 : (2020) 2 SCC (L&S)
587] , SCC pp. 56 & 62, paras 61 & 73)
"61.