Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.84 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Indian Medical Association vs V.P. Shantha & Ors on 13 November, 1995
Learned counsel for the appellant next contended that the
present case involves complicated question of facts for which experts
including doctors would be required to be examined and their cross-
examination may be necessary, therefore also, the National
Commission ought to have directed the complainant to approach the
Civil Court. For this purpose, the reliance is placed upon the
decision of this Court in Indian Medical Association v. V.P.
Shantha and others [(1995) 6 SCC 651 para 37] and it is submitted
that in the present case complicated question of fact involving
negligence of doctors is to be decided and, therefore, complainant
should be directed to approach the Civil Court. In the aforesaid case,
the Court rejected the said contention and observed thus:
Section 13 in The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 [Entire Act]
Section 203 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 304A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 [Entire Act]
Section 12 in The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 [Entire Act]
Charan Singh vs Healing Touch Hospital & Ors on 20 September, 2000
Further, while rejecting the similar contention where the
complainant was directed to approach State Commission or District
Forum, this Court in Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital and
Others [(2000) 7 SCC 668] observed that appellant ought not to have
been condemned unheard after waiting for six long years; the
legislative intent, for enacting the legislation, of a speedy summary
trial, to settle the claim of the complainant (consumers) has been
respected in breach. The spirit of the benevolent legislation has been
overlooked and its object frustrated by non-suiting the appellant in
the manner in which it has been done by the National Consumer
Forum. It was further observed that "the Consumer Forums must
take expeditious steps to deal with the complaints filed before them
and not keep them pending for years. It would defeat the object of
the Act, if summary trials are not disposed of expeditiously by the
forums at the District, State or National levels. Steps in this direction
are required to be taken in the right earnest".