Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.31 seconds)

Vinod @ Vijay Bhagubhai Patel vs State Of Gujarat & on 5 May, 2017

In Mohammad Riyaz v. The State Of Telangana2, the High Court for the States of Telangana and the Andhra Pradesh referring to the principle laid down in S. Naveen Kumar1 relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner and Vinod @ Vijay Bhagubhai Patel v. State of Gujarat [2017 (4) GLR 2804] quashed the proceedings against the customer for the offences punishable under Section - 370 of the IPC and Sections - 3 to 5 of the PITA, 2 . Criminal Petition No.5803 of 2018, decided on 27.06.2018 9 KL,J Crl. P No.1412 of 2022 however, permitted the Magistrate concerned to proceed further for the offence under Section - 370A (2) of the IPC. Therefore, this Court is of the considered opinion that the contents of the complaint lack the ingredients of Section Sections - 3, 4 and 5 of the PITA, however, the investigation may go on for the offence under Section - 370(A) (2) of the IPC.
Gujarat High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 17 - J B Pardiwala - Full Document

Mohammad Riyaz vs The State Of Telangana on 27 June, 2018

In Mohammad Riyaz v. The State Of Telangana2, the High Court for the States of Telangana and the Andhra Pradesh referring to the principle laid down in S. Naveen Kumar1 relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner and Vinod @ Vijay Bhagubhai Patel v. State of Gujarat [2017 (4) GLR 2804] quashed the proceedings against the customer for the offences punishable under Section - 370 of the IPC and Sections - 3 to 5 of the PITA, 2 . Criminal Petition No.5803 of 2018, decided on 27.06.2018 9 KL,J Crl. P No.1412 of 2022 however, permitted the Magistrate concerned to proceed further for the offence under Section - 370A (2) of the IPC. Therefore, this Court is of the considered opinion that the contents of the complaint lack the ingredients of Section Sections - 3, 4 and 5 of the PITA, however, the investigation may go on for the offence under Section - 370(A) (2) of the IPC.
Telangana High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 23 - Full Document
1