Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.50 seconds)Section 365 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
G. Parshwanath vs State Of Karnataka on 18 August, 2010
In the latest report of the Supreme Court in G. Parshwanath v. State
of Karnataka, 2010 (5) SCC 593; it was held that where the proved
circumstance completes the chain of evidence, it cannot be said that in the
absence of motive, the other circumstances are of no consequence.
Bipin Kumar Mondal vs State Of West Bengal on 26 July, 2010
In a recent judgment reported at Bipin Kumar Mondal vs. State of
West Bengal (2010) 12 SCC 91, it was held that motive is a thing which is
primarily known to the accused himself and it may not be possible for the
prosecution to explain what actually prompted or excited him to commit a
particular crime.
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs State Of Maharashtra on 17 July, 1984
In Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra‟, AIR 1984 SC
1622, the three Judge Bench of the Supreme Court relying on Hanumant
Govind Nargundkar (supra) set out the conditions which must be fulfilled
before a case against the accused can be said to be fully established. The
conditions are :-
Section 300 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Mohibur Rahman And Anr. vs State Of Assam on 21 August, 2002
In the case reported at Mohibur
Rahman vs. State of Assam (2002) 6 SCC 715, the Supreme Court observed
that there may be cases where on account of close proximity of place and
time between the event of the accused having been last seen with the
deceased and the factum of death, a rational mind may be persuaded to reach
an irresistible conclusion that either the accused should explain how and in
what circumstances the victim suffered the death or should own the liability
of the homicide.