Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.21 seconds)
Sukhendu Bikash Addy vs Bipin Behari Addy And Ors. on 23 July, 2001 cites

Baldeo Das And Ors. vs Kishanlal And Anr. on 16 July, 1969

Same view was taken in Chiranjilal v. Hardwarilal, ILR (1964) 2 Punj 321; and Baldeo Das v. Kishanlal . Once the sale is directed under Section 2 and no application under Section 3 is made then the sale is to be effected according to Section 6. There is nothing to show that Section 6 was not complied with when the present order was passed. On the other hand it shows there was a reserve price. The procedure for sale is provided in Section 7. It is not alleged that there was any infraction of Section 7.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 6 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1