Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 24 (0.91 seconds)Section 135 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Section 150 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Section 140 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Section 155 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Section 138 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
The Electricity Act, 2003
Section 151 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Smt. Jagdish Narayan vs North Delhi Power Limited And Anr. ... on 18 April, 2007
In Jagdish Narayan (Smt.) Vs. North Delhi Power
Limited 2007(140) DLT 307, it was held by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi
that no indication from inspection report for using any device or film or a
shunt to slow down the meter no accu check operatus was used to
determine if the meter was in fact recording lesser energy than it should. No
photographs of the condition of the meter at the time of inspection have
been shown although that by itself could not constitute proof. Penalty
formula used by respondent itself can not supply proof of DAE. Application
of LDHF formula also not constitute "conclusive proof" of DAE. Denial of
show cause notice and refusal to accept inspection report by the
petitionersmeter not installed in temper proof condition and outside reach
of any mischievous third party. In such circumstance not reasonable to draw
inference of DAE merely on discovery of some signs of tempering. It was
also held that an inference of DAE should not be permitted to be drawn on
the mere fact that a meter had been found with broken seals. No case of
DAE was made out in the aforesaid case.