Amar Nath Sehgal vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 21 February, 2005
4. The learned Single Judge examined the minutes of the 53 rd meeting of the
HCC held on 2nd February 2017. He also took note of the decision of the
Delhi Urban Arts Commission dated 1st March 2017 accepting the proposal
of ITPO for re-development of Pragati Maidan. The learned Single Judge
was of the view that with the expert body i.e. HCC having already examined
the issue and having taken a conscious decision not to consider buildings
less than 60 years old as heritage structures, and since such decision was not
challenged, Mr.Rewal had no legal right to seek the reliefs prayed for. The
learned Single Judge clarified that the dismissal of the writ petition would
not come in the way of Mr.Rewal seeking any remedy if available under the
Copyright Act, as had been sought to be urged by placing reliance on the
decision in Amar Nath Sehgal v. Union of India 2005 (117) DLT 717.