Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.16 seconds)Section 11 in The Court-fees Act, 1870 [Entire Act]
Musammat Vaishno Ditti vs Musammat Rameshri on 18 March, 1937
14. A somewhat similar question had come up before Privy Council for r its consideration in Mt.Vaishno Ditti v. Mt.Rameshri and other In the said case it was held that non-payment of the balance of court fee merely postpones the dates on which decree can be executed.
Section 144 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 96 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Mir Sahebmiya Bahadarmiya Sheikh vs State Of Gujarat on 11 February, 1980
Full Bench of Madras High Court in its turn adopted the view taken by Division Bench of Patna High Court in Kedar Nath Goenka v. Chandra Mauleshwar Prasad Singh AIR 132 Patna 228, which has also expressed the same view that after judgment is pronounced and is signed and sealed, there is no power left with the Court to alter it or add to it or subtract anything from it. Once the judgment is pronounced decree must be prepared in accordance with it. Following the said two decisions, Gujarat High Court also followed the same view in Mir Sahebmiya's case (supra).
1