Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.26 seconds)

Rajiv Gandhi Ekta Samiti vs Union Of India & Anr. on 23 December, 1999

10. On contrary, learned counsel appearing for intervener, namely, Nain Tara Sharma submits that it is well settled principle of law that even a third party can interfere in the proceeding under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. because the third party is not alien to the proceedings. It is further contended by him that admittedly, the intervener is a co-accused in the present case and each and every order being passed in the present case will have a bearing upon the defence of the intervener. In support of the aforesaid contention, a decision reported in (2009) 6 SCC 346 is referred. Furthermore, decision of Hon'ble Delhi High Court rendered in Rajiv Gandhi Ekta Samiti vs. Union of India and another delivered on 23.12.1999 was also referred on behalf of the intervener.
Delhi High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 8 - C Joseph - Full Document
1   2 Next