Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.25 seconds)
Dr. Ambujaksha Sinha Mahapatra & Anr. vs Amalendu Bhattacharjee on 30 July, 2024 cites

Rajmal Singh & Ors. vs Dr. Madhu Gupta & Ors. on 8 May, 2014

10.    The learned Counsel for the Respondent/ Complainant reiterated the facts of the Complaint and argued in favour of the impugned order passed by the State Commission. He asserted that OPs were negligent in diagnosing and treating Respondent. Referring the case of Rajmal Singh vs. Dr. Madhu Gupta (2014 SCC Online NCDRC 245), he argued that grossly wrong diagnosis cannot be dismissed as an error of judgment but constitutes negligence. The wrong diagnosis and resultant incorrect treatment, against the USG report dated 13.08.2014, indicate a deficiency in service and medical negligence, as Respondent No.1 did not receive the required treatment.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1