Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.50 seconds)Section 2 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
The Arms Act, 1959
Section 30 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
State Of Andhra Pradesh vs Golconda Linga Swamy And Anr on 27 July, 2004
―5. It is trite law that the power of the High Court
under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is required to be exercised
ex debito justitiae to prevent abuse of process of the
Court but should not be exercised to stifle legitimate
prosecution and the High Court cannot assume the
role of a Trial Court and embark upon an enquiry as to
the reliability of evidence and sustainability of
accusation on a reasonable appreciation of such
evidence. However, if on the face of the charge-sheet
the ingredients of the offences are not disclosed, the
High Court would be within its power to quash a
frivolous proceedings. [See State of A.P. Vs. Golconda
Linga Swamy & Anr. (2004) 6 SCC 522]
Juan Manuel Sanchez Rosas vs State Through; Nct Delhi & Anr. on 29 April, 2015
7. Similar view was expressed by this Court in Juan
Manuel Sanchez Rosas Vs. State through NCT Delhi &
Anr. Crl.M.C.2642/2014; Chan Hong Saik Thr. SPA:
Sonam Chaudhary vs The State (Govt Of Nct Delhi) on 6 January, 2016
Arvinder Singh Vs. State & Anr. Crl.M.C. 3576/2011;
Jaswinder Singh Vs. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi &
Anr. Crl.M.C. 4207/2014 and Sonam Chaudhary Vs.
The State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) Crl.M.C.471/2015.