Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 40 (0.23 seconds)
Smt. Rohini Srivastava W/O Late Shyam ... vs Director, Pension Directorate And ... on 3 August, 2004
cites
Article 162 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Sant Ram Sharma vs State Of Rajasthan & Anr on 7 August, 1967
33. Where no statutory rules are made regulating recruitment or conditions of service, the State Government can, in exercise of its executive power, issue administrative instructions providing for recruitment and conditions of service. B.N. Nagarajan v. State of Mysore AIR 1967 SC 1941; Sant Ram Sharma v. State of Rajasthan AIR 1967 SC 1910; Mallinath Jain v. Municipal Corporation 1973 (1) SLR 413; S.B. Pantnayak v. State of Orissa 1974 (1) SLR 171; Amerjeet Singh v. State of Punjab, 1975 (1) SLR 171; Lalit Mohan Deo v. Union of India AIR 1972 SC 1995 : 1989 SLJ(SC) 149.
B. N. Nagarajan And Ors vs State Of Mysore And Ors on 1 March, 1966
33. Where no statutory rules are made regulating recruitment or conditions of service, the State Government can, in exercise of its executive power, issue administrative instructions providing for recruitment and conditions of service. B.N. Nagarajan v. State of Mysore AIR 1967 SC 1941; Sant Ram Sharma v. State of Rajasthan AIR 1967 SC 1910; Mallinath Jain v. Municipal Corporation 1973 (1) SLR 413; S.B. Pantnayak v. State of Orissa 1974 (1) SLR 171; Amerjeet Singh v. State of Punjab, 1975 (1) SLR 171; Lalit Mohan Deo v. Union of India AIR 1972 SC 1995 : 1989 SLJ(SC) 149.
The Municipal Corporation Of Greater ... vs The Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. on 27 November, 1990
In Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. , the Supreme Court has observed as under:
S.P. Jain vs Krishna Mohan Gupta & Ors on 4 December, 1986
In S.P. Jain v. Krishna Mohan Gupta , the Supreme Court has held that law should take a pragmatic view of the matter and response to the purpose for which it was made and also take cognizance of the current capabilities and life-style of the community. It is well settled that the purpose of law provides a good guide to the interpretation of meaning of the 'Act'. The legislature futility is to be ruled-out so long as the legislative policy permits.
The Daily Partap vs The Regional Provident Fund ... on 29 October, 1998
In Daily Pratap v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner , the Supreme court has held that the Court must always keep in view the beneficial and social welfare aspect of the statute.
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner vs S.D. College, Hoshiarpur G Ors on 28 October, 1996
Same view has been reiterated by the Supreme Court in Dinkar Anna Patil v. State of Maharastha and Ors. ; Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. S.D. College, Hoshiarpur ; Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Maharashtra General Kamgar Union and Ors. .
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd vs Maharashtra Genl.Kamgar Union & Ors on 14 December, 1998
Same view has been reiterated by the Supreme Court in Dinkar Anna Patil v. State of Maharastha and Ors. ; Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. S.D. College, Hoshiarpur ; Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Maharashtra General Kamgar Union and Ors. .
Vaijanath & Ors vs Guramma & Anr on 18 November, 1998
In Vaijanath and Ors. v. Guramma and Anr. , the Supreme Court has held that remedial 'Act' should be given beneficial interpretation.