Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.46 seconds)Section 10D in The Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Dr. Saurabh Dwivedi vs Union Of India on 7 June, 2017
9.1 At the outset, it is required to be noted that, as such,
and it is not in dispute that such "Institutional Preference" in
the Post Graduate Medical Courses is held to be permissible
by this Court in catena of decisions, more particularly a
three-Judge Bench decision of this Court in Pradeep Jain
(1984) 3 SCC 654; a Constitution Bench decision of this
Court in Saurabh Chaudri (2003) 11 SCC 146; and in
Saurabh Dwivedi v. Union of India (2017) 7 SCC 626.
Dr. Dinesh Kumar & Ors vs Motilal Nehru Medical College ... on 1 May, 1985
In that
decision, this Court also took note of the subsequent decision
in the case of Dinesh Kumar (2) v. Motilal Nehru Medical
College fixing the "Institutional Preference" to the extent of
25%. However, after taking note of the said decision, this
Court has reiterated the scheme framed in Pradeep Jain
providing "Institutional Preference" confined to 50% of the
total number of open seats. In Saurabh Chaudhri, this Court
has again approved the "Institutional Preference". Thus,
right from 1971 onwards till 2017, consistently this Court
has approved and/or permitted the "Institutional Preference"
Article 15 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Saurabh Chaudri & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 4 November, 2003
25. This Court finds that the State of Rajasthan has decided to
give admission to only those candidates who have done their
MBBS course from any Medical College situated in the State of
Rajasthan and as such, the same amounts to institution-wise
reservation in favour of such candidates. The issue of providing
institution-wise reservation is no more res-integra in view of the
judgment passed by the Apex Court in the case of Saurabh
Chaudri (supra).
The Pre-Conception And Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition Of Sex Selection) Act, 1994
Yatinkumar Jasubhai Patel vs State Of Gujarat on 4 October, 2019
27. The Apex Court in the case of Yatinkumar Jasubhai Patel
& Ors. Vs State of Gujarat & Ors. reported in (2019) 10 SCC
1 again considered the extent of institutional preference and
extent of 50% of total number of seats has been held to be
permissible. The relevant portion of the judgment is quoted
hereunder :-
1