Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.38 seconds)

M/S. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... on 13 May, 2014

He also submitted that in any case the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) are attracted only in cases where the amounts remain payable as at the end of the year and not to the amounts which have already been paid in view of the decision of Special Bench in case of Merilyn Shipping 7 Transport V. Addl CIT, Range-I, Visakhapatnam, 136 ITD 23 (Visakhapatnam)(SB).
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 0 - Cited by 33 - Full Document

The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S.Lsakhani Rubber Works on 30 March, 2010

7. After considering the rival submissions we find Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in case of CIT V. Lakhani Rubber Works (supra) while following the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of CIT V. Alom Extrusions Ltd. 319 ITR 306 (S.C) held even if payment is made late, the same is allowable. Respectfully following this decision, we hold that late payment of provident fund dues within grace period is allowable expenditure and accordingly we confirm the order of the ld. CIT(A).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 17 - J Chauhan - Full Document
1   2 Next