Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.25 seconds)Section 313 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 312 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005
Sajjan Kumar vs C.B.I on 20 September, 2010
In Sajjan Kumar Vs. CBI (2010) 9 SCC 368, same
principles were followed by Hon'ble Supreme Court and herein it
was also held that if two views are possible and one of them gives rise to
suspicion only, as distinguished from grave suspicion, the trial Judge will be
empowered to discharge the accused and at this stage, he is not to see
whether the trial will end in conviction or acquittal.
Geeta Mehrotra & Anr vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 17 October, 2012
In Geeta Mehrotra (Supra), it was held that mere
casual reference to the brother and sister of husband in the FIR is
not sufficient to take cognizance and complaint is liable to be
quashed.
Union Of India vs Prafulla Kumar Samal & Anr on 6 November, 1978
11. Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India Vs.
Prafulla Kumar Samal, 1979 (3) SCC 4 laid down the principle
of law applicable at the stage of framing of charge. It was held
that:
Sushil Kumar Sharma vs Union Of India And Ors on 19 July, 2005
In Sushil Kumar Sharma Vs. Union of India & Ors.
[(2005) 6 SCC 281], Hon'ble Supreme Court held that by misuse
of provision of Section 498A/406 IPC, a new "legal terrorism"