Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 94 (0.04 seconds)Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Rudul Sah vs State Of Bihar And Another on 1 August, 1983
These
cases, namely, Rudul Shah vs. State of Bihar (supra); Bhim
Singh vs. State of J&K (supra), SAHELI, a Woman's Resources
Centre vs. Commr. of Police, Delhi (supra); People's
Union of Democratic Rights vs. Police Commissioner, Delhi
(supra) and Sebastin M. Hongray vs. Union of India (1984)
3 SCC 82 = AIR 1984 SC 1026, do not refer to the decision of
this Court in Kasturilal's case (supra).
Smt. Nilabati Behera Alias Lalit Behera ... vs State Of Orissa And Ors on 24 March, 1993
Thereafter the Court proceeded to hear Mr. Harish N.
Salve on the question of damages and after considering
certain English decisions on the question of exemplary
damages and also the decision of this Court in Neelabati
Behera vs. State of Orissa (1993) 2 SCC 746, in which it
was laid down that the damages can be awarded by this Court
in a proceeding under Article 32 of the Constitution, the
Court directed the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.50 lakhs as
exemplary damages to the Govt. Exchequer, with the
observation that since the property with which the
petitioner was dealing was Govt. property, the Govt., which
is "By the people", has to be compensated. The Court
further directed the petitioner to deposit the amount with
the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Govt. of India within
nine months. It was further provided that the amount, if
not paid, would be recoverable as arrears of land revenue.