Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.25 seconds)Bilasirai Laxminarayan vs Cursondas Damodardas on 21 July, 1919
"Now the Munsiff, although he did not find that there was sufficient causes for the plaintiff's non-appearance which would have required him to restore the suit, does not appear to have considered whether this was not a case in which to exercise his inherent powers. That there is such a power in the Court has been repeatedly held. See Bilasirai v. Cursondas, 44 Bom. 82: (A.I.R. (7) 1920 Bom.
Raja Debi Bakhsh Singh vs Habib Shah on 29 April, 1913
Section 151, Civil P.C., could not be applied as the application was one within the scope of Order 41, Rule 19, corresponding to Order 9, Rule 13. Miller C.J. did not in the case reported in 26 MYS C.C.R. 248, hesitate to confirm the order restoring a suit dismissed for default of appearance under Section 151, Civil P.C., relying on the Privy Council Case, Debi Bukhsh Singh v. Habib Shah, 35 ALL.