Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.20 seconds)The State Of Madhya Pradesh & Ors vs Gopal D. Tirthani & Ors on 28 July, 2003
That apart such an interpretation is also in direct contradiction with the law laid down by the Apex Court in Paragraph 36 of the judgment in the case of Gopal Tirthani (supra) specifically conclusions 2, 3 and 4, wherein it has been categorically held that eligibility for admission has to be determined only on the basis of the marks obtained in the common entrance examination and the requirement of obtaining minimum qualifying marks in the common entrance examination cannot be lowered or relaxed contrary to Medical Council of India Regulations. Ergo, we reiterate that we are not impressed by the aforesaid submission and accordingly it stands repelled.
The Chhattisgarh Municipalities Act, 1961
1