S. Vincent vs The State Of Tamilnadu on 24 March, 2005
6. The learned Government Advocate for the respondents 1 to 3 has
submitted that filing of repeated representation will not give fresh cause of
action. When the petitioner's representation was not favourably considered,
the petitioner ought to have agitated at that time itself. The petitioner
did not challenge the order, dated 22.2.2000, rejecting the request of the
petitioner to approve his appointment w.e.f. 01.06.1996. Further, the
petitioner retired from service on 31.5.2000. Therefore, in any event, no
cause of action arises after 31.5.2000. He relied on the Judgment in
W.P.No.3738 of 1998 dated 24.3.2005 [S.Vincent Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and
others], wherein in paragraph 5, it has been held as follows: