Kum. Madhuri Patil & Anr vs Add1. Commnr., Tribal Development, ... on 28 April, 1997
4. It is then submitted by the learned Additional Advocate General
that the State, on it's own, by a letter, provided an appellate remedy to the
State Level Committee and in view of a District Level Committee being
constituted strictly in terms of Madhuri Patil's case, there would be no need
for an appellate remedy. In our considered opinion, if this suggestion is
accepted, then against the District Level Committee's order, there would be
writ petitions before this court directly. If the appellate remedy, as is in
existence today, is continued in future also, then this court is of the
opinion that to a large extent filing of writ petitions before this court may
be reduced. Under these circumstances, we recommend to the State Government
to provide an appellate remedy, as they have already provided in respect of
the orders passed earlier, and to prescribe a procedure for filing an appeal
before the appellate authority and indicate as to who is the appellate
authority.