Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.20 seconds)The Customs Act, 1962
Section 5 in The Customs Tariff Act, 1975 [Entire Act]
Rajnish Steel Industries, Mahalaxmi ... vs Commissioner Of Customs And Central ... on 5 December, 2001
(iii) R.S. Industries (Rolling Mills) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central
Excise, Jaipur - 2018 (359) E.L.T. 698 (Tri. - Del..)
) M/S.Bdb Exports Pvt.Ltd vs Commissioner Of Customs(Prev.), West ... on 15 September, 2016
(iv) BDB Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Preventive),
Kolkata - 2017 (347) E.L.T. 662 (Tri.- Kolkata)
6
C/86557/2023
C/86558/2023
& C/86766/2023
3.4 In view of the above submissions, learned Advocate prayed the
impugned order is liable to be set aside and requested that their appeal filed
by the appellants may be allowed.
Mr. N. K. Brahmachari, Managing Partner ... vs The Commissioner Of Customs, (Import) on 29 January, 2016
4.4 In support of Revenue's stand, learned AR had relied upon the
judgement of Bombay High Court, in the case Amritlakshmi Machine Works
Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Import) - 2016 (336) E.L.T. 225 (Bombay).
The Customs Tariff Act, 1975
M/S. Chalissery Kirana Merchant vs Union Of India on 27 January, 2015
9.3 In the case of Chalissery Kirana Merchant Vs. Union of India -2012
(323) E.L.T. 556 (Kar.), the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka have held that
invoice and certificate of origin of concerned chamber of commerce
indicating country of origin being a SAFTA country to be preferred over mere
contrary suspicion. The relevant paragraphs of the said judgement is
extracted and given below:
Section 49 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
1