Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.27 seconds)
Mansukha Meena vs Comm. Of Police on 9 January, 2026 cites

Commissioner Of Police, Delhi And Anr. vs Dhaval Singh on 1 May, 1998

2.2 The applicant was acquitted from the criminal case much prior from the date of filling of attestation form and was bonafide under impression that details of case in which conviction took place needs to be given thus not revealed the detail of criminal case. The present act of the applicant shows that applicant has no malafide intention to conceal the details of criminal case. The Item No. 44/C-4 4 OA No. 2919/2021 present case thus cannot be a case of concealment as the applicant sou-motu corrected the inadvertent error prior to the issue of notice for cancelling of candidature on concealment of fact. The present submission is supported by the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court titled Commissioner of Police Vs. Dhaval Singh decided on 01.05.1998, reported in 1999 (1) SCC
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 107 - S R Babu - Full Document

Vipul Kumar vs Gnctd on 31 March, 2017

9. Ordinarily, we would have referred the matter to the Competent Authority to take a holistic view in terms of the Item No. 44/C-4 14 OA No. 2919/2021 observation in the aforesaid order/judgment dated 29.04.2025 passed by this Tribunal in O.A. No. 1160/2022 titled Chaudhari Vipul Kumar Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors., particularly, in light of paragraph 8 (i) thereof. However, considering the fact that the impugned order has been passed by the Deputy Commissioner (Recruitment), who was also instrumental in issuing the show cause notice, we do not consider it appropriate to follow the direction of remanding the matter to the Recruitment Cell for reconsideration of suitability, as such suitability has already been assessed and observed hereinabove.
Central Information Commission Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next