Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 27 (0.04 seconds)Section 331A in The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 144 in The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Mahabeer vs State Of U.P.Thru Consolidation ... on 8 February, 2017
22. There is difference between abatement of proceedings of suit pending before the Court and the inherent lack of jurisdiction with that Court in dealing with the proceedings before it. In the opinion of this Court, the petitioners, therefore, cannot derive any assistance from the decision in Mahabeer vs. State of U.P. and others (supra).
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Section 176 in The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 178 in The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 331 in The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 333 in The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Kiran Singh And Others vs Chaman Paswan And Others on 14 April, 1954
26. The Court also relied upon the decision in Kiran Singh v. Chaman Paswan[AIR 1954 SC 340 : (1955) 1 SCR 117] and quoted (in Harshad Chiman Lal case[(2005) 7 SCC 791] , SCC pp. 804-05, para 33) therefrom: (Kiran Singh case [AIR 1954 SC 340 : (1955) 1 SCR 117] , AIR p. 342, para 6)
"6. ... It is a fundamental principle well established that a decree passed by a court without jurisdiction is a nullity, and that its invalidity could be set up whenever and wherever it is sought to be enforced or relied upon, even at the stage of execution and even in collateral proceedings. A defect of jurisdiction, ... strikes at the very authority of the court to pass any decree, and such a defect cannot be cured even by consent of parties."