Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.34 seconds)The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Section 7 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 19 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Anil Kumar & Ors vs M.K Aiyappa & Anr on 1 October, 2013
Court has carefully perused judgment reported in
2013 (10) SCC 705 titled Anil Kumar and others Vs.
M.K.Aiyappa and another. Ruling cited supra is announced
by Hon'ble Division Bench of Supreme Court and Hon'ble
Division Bench of Supreme Court held that Special Judge
could not refer the matter under Section 156 (3) Cr.PC
against public servant without valid previous sanction order
::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 18:39:33 :::HCHP
7
for prosecution. Court has also carefully perused the ruling
.
Devarapalll Lakshminarayana Reddy & ... vs V.Narayana Reddy & Ors on 4 May, 1976
reported in 1976 (3) SCC 252 titled D.L.Reddy and others Vs.
V.Narayana Reddy and others announced by Hon'ble three
judges bench of apex Court of India. Hon'ble three judges
bench of apex Court of India held that power under Section
156(3) Chapter XII Cr.PC and powers under Section 200
of
Chapter XV Cr.PC are entirely two different powers. Hon'ble
three judges bench of apex Court of India held that power
rt
under Section 156(3) Cr.PC under Chapter XII is exercised at
pre-cognizance stage of case. Hon'ble three judges bench of
apex Court of India further held that power under Section
200 Chapter XV Cr.PC is exercised in post cognizance stage
of the case. It is well settled law that when there is conflict
between rulings of two judges bench and three judges bench
then decision of three judges bench always prevails.
Priyanka Srivastava & Anr vs State Of U.P.& Ors on 19 March, 2015
Also see 2014 (2) SCC 1 titled
Lalita Kumari Vs. Vs. State of UP. Also see 2015 (6) SCC 287
titled Priyanka Srivastava and another Vs. State of Uttar
Pradesh and others.